English actress Maisie Williams, known for her role as Arya Stark in the Game of Thrones (GoT) series, has let it be known that she is considering becoming a Bitcoiner. A question relating to Bitcoin (BTC) asked on Twitter that will have ignited the entire crypto-sphere.

Maisie Williams, „HODL the Bitcoin“

Last night, Maisie Williams , the famous actress who played Arya Stark in Game of Thrones ignited „Crypto Twitter“. The actress asked her 2.7 million followers whether or not she should “ Long on Bitcoin ” understand betting on the rise of Bitcoin (BTC).

At the time of writing, no less than 815,000 people have responded to the survey. Although the majority of voters do not advise him to invest in Bitcoin, the gap remains quite small: 45% for and 55% against.

According to many estimates , the fortune accumulated by Maisie Williams for her role of Arya Stark would amount to 6 million dollars , enough to acquire several dozen bitcoins.

Here’s the tweet in question that sparked all of Crypto Twitter’s buzz:

Bitcoiners in turmoil

As often when a public figure mentions Bitcoin on Twitter, the responses of seasoned Bitcoiners were not long in coming.

Most of the comments obviously refer to the universe of Game of Thrones or other series, here is an anthology of the best.

Twitter’s most popular response is from Tesla CEO Elon Musk , referring to The Witcher series:

„Throw a bitcoin at your witcher“

Barry Silbert , the founder and CEO of fund manager Grayscale , invites him to take a look at his company’s cryptocurrency investment services. Not without humor, Barry Silbert specifies that it is about Grayscale and not of its namesake “ Greyscale “ (Grisécaille), the latter being a disease of the universe of Game of Thrones:

„You should take a look at Grayscale (the other)“

Cryptocurrency exchanges did not say no to a highlight to Maisie Williams‘ followers, including Gemini:

“The crypto winter is not coming. Watch Gemini if ​​you want to „stark“ some sats! “

Billionaire investor Mike Novogratz , founder and CEO of Galaxy Digital , urges him to acquire Bitcoin:

“I bought more BTC last night at $ 15,800. It goes to 20,000 and then to $ 65,000. The network effect has taken over. I see tons of new buyers and there are very few offers. It’s an easier trade here than at $ 11,000. So YES, buy some. „

How would the Digital Currency Group (DCG) company be valued if it went public? Analysts from Messari now provide an answer to this question.

On 12 November, research analyst Jack Purdy published a report in which he examines a theoretical IPO of the Digital Currency Group. According to Purdy’s calculations, the company would have a valuation of four billion US dollars if it went public. This result is based on publicly available data from DCG.

DCG owns, among other things, a wide range of different crypto brands, such as Genesis, Grayscale and Coindesk, which generate an annual turnover of approximately $243 million. The company also owns Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) and a dozen other crypto currencies.

For years there has been speculation as to which company in the crypto industry would be the first to go public. Although some companies involved in block chain technologies have been listed on the stock exchange in the past, these were not pure crypto companies such as DCG or Coinbase. Purdy commented on this consideration:

Once this happens, it could be the Netscape moment for crypto, where a high-profile IPO triggers a flood of subsequent bids, fuelling investors‘ enthusiasm to get involved in the emerging but fast-growing industry.

However, the company did not respond to the request for comments. However, the company’s founder and CEO, Barry Silbert, said that he wanted to transform DCG into the Berkshire Hathaway of crypto technology.

Purdy is less concerned with an actual IPO of DCG. But the evidence is currently lacking. Rather, he wants to give an impression of the magnitude and potential scope.

IOST Conecta-se com a Gravidade para DeFi Inter-Chain

A cadeia de bloqueio IOST de alto rendimento e grau empresarial está fazendo parceria com a Waves em um movimento que verá a Gravity conectar-se à rede escalável para promover a DeFi de cadeia cruzada, conforme uma atualização em 3 de novembro.

IOST se une ao Ethereum e ao Tron

Como uma cadeia de alvo, a IOST agora se une a outras plataformas estabelecidas como Tron e Ethereum para Bitcoin Future se conectar ao sistema de Oráculo de código aberto e não-Ethereum.

A gravidade é uma cadeia de bloqueio e um sistema de oráculos agnósticos simbólicos e uma âncora para DeFi- entre cadeias, que permanece subexplorada apesar de sua potência.

Desde seu lançamento, tem atraído vários dApps e protocolos que oferecem uma opção para que estes programas se expandam além do domínio do Ethereum e de seus oráculos.

A gravidade começou no protocolo Waves. Waves é uma plataforma de contratação inteligente que suporta a tokenization, mas que está interessada em expandir-se para o financiamento aberto.

A gravidade é uma ponte que desencadeará a adoção da DeFi inter-cadeia (InDeFi) atuando como uma camada base, uma infra-estrutura que reunirá cadeias de bloqueios e ecossistemas em várias facetas da DeFi.

Através do InDeFi, os projetos podem criar gateways multi-funcionais entre as redes de prova de participação e o Ethereum. Portanto, ao simplesmente adquirir uma ficha embrulhada pertencente a uma ficha alimentada por Ondas de PoS-say embrulhadas em um Ethereum DEX, seria uma recompensa antecipada.

Novas Oportunidades e Liquidez Melhorada

Ao fazer parceria com a Waves e incorporar a Gravity, a IOST se beneficiará de novas oportunidades comerciais. Construído em cima do Protocolo de Gravidade, o Susy Gateway é usado para trocas de fichas em cadeia cruzada.

Como tal, a moeda IOST estará disponível em plataformas concorrentes como Ethereum, Tron, e outras integradas com a Gravity como uma ficha embrulhada, abrindo até mesmo o caminho para a listagem da IOST em DEXs líderes em vários protocolos, incluindo o Uniswap.

Além disso, a Gravity é uma solução oráculo. A integração com a IOST cria novas oportunidades para os desenvolvedores da dApp. Através dos contratos inteligentes de grau empresarial, os desenvolvedores irão extrair dados verificados do mundo real, melhorando ainda mais sua experiência.

Com oportunidades expandidas, a IOST se beneficiará de liquidez extra. A gravidade é um símbolo e uma cadeia de bloqueio agnóstica sem sua moeda nativa ou símbolo de governança. Isto significa que as taxas podem ser pagas na IOST e usadas como garantia para os donos dos nós.

No início de setembro, o  relatou a ativação de Malibu. O objetivo da atualização é abrir caminho para a DeFi sustentável.

The LINK price is moving between support at $ 8.75 and resistance at $ 13.10.

The course went under an ascending support line.

The price is probably in wave B of an ABC correction

The Trust Project is an international consortium of news organizations based on transparency standards.

The course Chainlink (LINK) is retracement since its rejection by a high resistance area.

Although it has gone under a short-term structure, price is expected to start rising soon, until it passes its current resistance zone.

The advance and then the rejection of LINK

Link’s price has been following a declining resistance line since August 17th. On October 8, it broke that line, before reaching a high of $ 13.05. It was rejected by resistance at $ 13.10 soon after, however, and has been in decline ever since.

The price is currently approaching the support area of ​​$ 8.75. This zone corresponds to the fibonacci level 0.618 of the entire upward movement, and it should probably support the price.

Despite strong support near price, technical indicators in the daily timescale are firmly bearish. The RSI has declined below 50, the Stochastic Oscillator has generated a bearish cross, and the MACD is likely to fall below zero. These are signs of a downward trend.

Cryptocurrency trader @TradingTank shared a LINK chart. He says price will likely continue to decline after a failed break above a descending resistance line.

In the short-term six-hour chart, price has likely passed below an ascending support line, and is now declining.

As in the daily timescale, technical indicators are bearish. The RSI is below 50 and the MACD is below zero. No bullish divergence is present.

The two closest support areas are the fibonacci levels 0.618 and 0.786, located at $ 9.51 and $ 8.54 respectively. The $ 8.54 area coincides with the aforementioned support, so it’s more likely that this level will act as a bottom.

Bitcoin przeszedł ostrą wyprzedaż w poniedziałek, dwa dni po tym, jak osiągnął trzyletni poziom powyżej 14.000 dolarów.

Krypto waluta benchmarkowa została skorygowana w dół do 13.215 dolarów. Ale szybko odzyskał część swoich strat kilka minut po dotknięciu niżu śróddziennego.

Technicznie rzecz biorąc, odrzucenie z minusem pojawiło się w postaci długiego knota. Większość handlowców zgadza się, że negatywne knoty wskazują na bycze odwrócenie, zwłaszcza, że ich dno pokrywa się z innymi poziomami wsparcia.

W poniedziałek, Bitcoin zilustrował ten zbieg okoliczności, jak pokazano na poniższym wykresie.

Bitcoin odbija się od siebie po przetestowaniu Rising Trendline.

Cena spadła do poziomu, który ostatnio stał się dla handlowców punktem odwrócenia – strefą akumulacji po każdej wyprzedaży od 21 października. To samo wsparcie pozwoliło Bitcoinowi ograniczyć swoje niedźwiedzie uprzedzenia wobec rosnącej presji sprzedaży, wysyłając swoją cenę o 500 dolarów w górę.

Jednocześnie, Bitcoin pozostał na minusie z powodu znacznej obecności sprzedaży w pobliżu poziomego oporu około 13.820 dolarów. Kryptofaktura utworzyła w jej pobliżu długi knot, choć zwrócona na północ. W sumie pozostawił go wewnątrz kanału konsolidacyjnego, który wygląda jak Trójkąt Wznoszący.

Breakout wzywa

Trójkąt Wznoszący jest byczym wzorem, który tworzy się podczas trendu wzrostowego. Atut potwierdza go, kiedy jego cena rozpoczyna sekwencję wyższych niżów, jednocześnie ograniczając jego odchylenie do góry nogami wokół linii oporu. Jest to w dużej mierze przypadek Bitcoina w jego trwającym trendzie, jak pokazano na powyższym wykresie.

Dzięki temu, krypto waluta mogłaby się skonsolidować w ramach Trójkąta. Ale powtarzany retest linii oporu powinien w końcu doprowadzić do przełamania się ponad nią. To znaczy, zgodnie z historią Trójkątów Wznoszących się, tak czy inaczej.

Są jednak dodatkowe wymagania. W miarę rozwoju wzorca Trójkąta, wolumeny kurczą się. Bitcoin przechodzi przez ten scenariusz.

W międzyczasie, wyłom powinien pojawić się z nagłym wybuchem wolumenu, lub grozi zamienieniem się w fałszywy ruch do góry nogami, który może umieścić Bitcoin z powrotem w zakresie Trójkątów.

Ale w momencie wybuchu, idealny cel Trójkąt Wznoszący jest największym dystansem pomiędzy jego dwoma liniami trendu. W obecnym scenariuszu jest to wysokość Trójkątów, która wynosi około 1.200 dolarów.

To stawia następny cel cenowy Bitcoin’a 1 200$ powyżej jego linii oporu blisko 13 820$. Jest to czysty przebieg byka powyżej 15.000 dolarów.

Dobre podstawy Bitcoinów

Faza konsolidacji w ramach Trójkąta Wznoszącego zbiega się również z okresem niepewności rynkowej wokół wyborów prezydenckich w USA. Wyraźne zwycięstwo Donalda Trumpa lub Joe Bidena gwarantuje jedno: Kongres Stanów Zjednoczonych przejdzie długo opóźniany pakiet pomocy koronawirusowej.

Wygląda na to, że handlowcy Bitcoinów obserwują rozwój sytuacji w przestrzeni politycznej USA. Podczas gdy ci, którzy mają krótkoterminowy apetyt na ryzyko, próbują zrzucić swoje udziały (stąd niedźwiedzi knot), ci, którzy mają średnioterminową perspektywę wzrostu, kupują dipy (stąd 500 dolarów zwrotu).

Duża część krótkoterminowego ryzyka Bitcoin’a zależy również od sposobu, w jaki rozgrywany jest sezon wyborczy. Bitcoinista omawia to tutaj szczegółowo.

Enquanto Trump enfrenta Biden nas pesquisas, o Bitcoin sentirá o abalo secundário?

Hora da eleição! A batalha entre “ Sleepy ” Joe Biden e “ Tiny Hands ” Trump será travada nas urnas esta noite, e talvez nos tribunais nas próximas semanas. Mas o que isso está fazendo com o Bitcoin , e como a eleição de 2020 se compara à última eleição?

O preço do Bitcoin no dia da eleição é de US $ 13.685, de acordo com o site de métricas CoinMarketCap, alta de 1,82% nas últimas 24 horas

As 5 principais notícias e recursos criptográficos na sua caixa de entrada todos os dias.
Obtenha o Daily Digest para obter o melhor da Decrypt. Notícias, recursos originais e muito mais.
Seu email

Na noite da eleição de 2016, quando o presidente Trump derrotou Hillary Clinton de “ Crazy / Crooked / Lyin ‚ ”, o preço de um único Bitcoin era de $ 700. Após a vitória de Trump, o Bitcoin subiu para $ 735. Isso representa um aumento de 18x no preço do Bitcoin nos últimos quatro anos.

E que tal 2012, quando “ Cheatin ‚” Obama venceu o “ Choke-artist ” Mitt Romney? Os dados são nebulosos, mas o Bitcoin valia cerca de US $ 11,2 em outubro e US $ 12,56 em novembro, de acordo com o Statista. Para aqueles que „deveriam ter comprado Bitcoin há muito tempo“, sim, isso representa um aumento de 1.000 vezes em seu preço desde o segundo mandato de Obama.

Se nada mais, as enormes diferenças de preços mostram o quanto pode mudar entre as eleições

Enquanto a América testa as bases de sua democracia neste mês, os comerciantes de Bitcoin também devem testar novos preços. No mês passado, o preço do Bitcoin subiu de cerca de US $ 10.500 no início do mês para picos de pouco mais de US $ 14.000 no fim de semana.

Muitas pessoas pensam que o Bitcoin não está correlacionado com os eventos globais: a chamada teoria do “porto seguro”. Como uma classe de ativos que os investidores apresentam como isolada contra eventos políticos, ela permanecerá imperturbável com a eleição?

Apenas as cédulas dirão – a menos que Trump ou Biden as conteste.

Was braucht die Financial Times, um sich geschlagen zu geben?

Die Financial Times mag Bitcoin nicht . Oder Kryptowährung . Oder irgendetwas außerhalb seiner traditionellen Bankensphäre. Dies ist vielleicht nicht überraschend, wenn man bedenkt, dass die Zeitung 132 Jahre alt ist und sich an eine bestimmte Menge richtet, aber obwohl einige ihrer Argumente legitim sind, sind sie von Zeit zu Zeit so abweisend gegenüber dem einen oder anderen Aspekt von Bitcoin Circuit, dass sie Sie an die ‚erinnern. alter Mann schreit Bitcoin ‚Meme an.

Bitcoin-Halbierungsstück enthüllte Unverständnis

Ein solches Beispiel dreht sich um die „Berichterstattung“ der Financial Times über die Halbierung der Bitcoin im Mai . Am halben Tag veröffentlichte die Zeitung einen Artikel , in dem die Rede von der Reduzierung der Belohnungen abgelehnt wurde, was zu einem Preisanstieg führte, obwohl die Geschichte etwas anderes vorschlug.

Nachdem der Autor zugegeben hatte, dass das deflationäre Modell „ziemlich geschickt“ war, untergrub er sein Wissen über Bitcoin, indem er seine inhärente Knappheit mit den Hunderten von Bitcoin-Gabeln da draußen verband:

… Es gibt keine Knappheit bei der Anzahl der Nachahmer-Kryptowährungen, was die Idee der Knappheit bei Bitcoin untergräbt.

Abgesehen davon war das Stück der Financial Times bei der Erörterung der Halbierung voller Spott über diejenigen, die vorausgesagt hatten, dass die Halbierung erneut als Preiskatalysator fungieren würde, und scherzte: „Die Brüder scheinen immer noch auf diese Halbierung zu hoffen wird der Preis steigen. “

Nun, der Preis ist sicherlich gestiegen – am halben Tag wurde er mit 8.500 USD bewertet und steht heute bei 11.845 USD. Das ist eine Steigerung von 39%. In traditionellen Märkten würde das sicherlich als Anstieg gelten, aber wenn wir über Bitcoin sprechen, werden wir das einfach unter den Teppich schieben, weil es nicht zur Erzählung passt, ja?

Financial Times wird immer eine Entschuldigung finden, um Bitcoin zu verprügeln

Es stellt sich die Frage, wann die Financial Times zugeben wird, dass ihre Schadenfreude und Skepsis fehl am Platz ist. Was muss Bitcoin tun, um sich einen Aufschub zu verdienen – Allzeithochs brechen, 100.000 US-Dollar erreichen, Coronavirus heilen?

Es hat sich vom Marktcrash im März um einen Wert von 238% erholt – wenn es wirklich ein so wertloser Vermögenswert wäre, wie die Financial Times vermuten lässt, wäre es dann und dort sicherlich gestorben? Und was passiert, wenn sich die Prophezeiung erfüllt und Bitcoin „sprudelt“? Sie werden eine andere Ausrede finden, um es zuzuschreiben, eine andere Möglichkeit, es zu verunglimpfen.

Nur acht Wochen bevor sie Bitcoin vorzeitig entließen, versuchte die Financial Times, einen Umsatzrückgang von 39% zu verdauen, während Bitcoin sich von seinem Crash im März erholte.